Beats Studio3 Wireless vs Beats Solo 3: Comparison

Well-designed wireless headphones with closed-back earbuds, user-friendly buttons, and a foldable style design: the Studio3 and the Solo3.

Both are easy to use, and their construction characteristics are very similar. However, since they are different types of headphones, in terms of fit, they are distinctly different and carry different pros and cons in that respect. The Beats Studio3 and Solo3 are both fairly awesome headphones.

Yeah, they’re pricey, but they both have a lot to offer. Due to their similar aesthetics, the Studio3 and the Solo3 might seem to be the same headphones from a distance, but they are different types of headphones. The Studio3 and the Solo3 are very close to building quality.

Features of the Beats Studio3Wireless vs Beats Solo 3

Although they don’t sound as high as their expensive price tags suggest, both are a good pair of headphones that, after just a few small drops, won’t easily fall apart.

Their two headbands are both flexible and metal-reinforced, while their ear cups are well-padded and feel sturdy. Yeah, while the Solo3s does not boast any of the features provided by Studio3, they are still decent headphones and, depending on what you’re looking for, are probably a better value.

Not only do the Solo3s have a lower price- of $300 compared to the Studio3’s $350, they’ve been out longer, which means we also see more offers on them. When it comes to price, no brainer here.

Thanks to Apple’s W1 chip, both headphones have amazing Bluetooth range and stability. The W1 chip also offers seamless iOS and iCloud integration, pairs automatically with all your Apple devices, and allows you to quickly move between those devices.

The Studio3 are over-ear headphones with a bulkier build and a more relaxed fit because they do not press your ears directly. Meanwhile, the Solo3 are on-ear headphones with smaller ear cups and a more ambient design that is useful for long listening sessions.

Now, even after long listening times, both headphones will tire your ears, we give Studio3 the advantage in terms of comfort. Compared to the on-ear configuration of the Solo3, they have an over-ear design.

I wouldn’t say now that the Studio3 is real over-ear headphones because they don’t seal fully over your ear, but they are still very comfortable and very soft ear pads.

Both headphones have tighter clamps that, after a few hours of continuous use, some might find uncomfortable, particularly with the Solo3, which presses your ears directly. This makes for a more comfortable and stable fit, on the plus side.

Both headphones are good enough for sports use with their tighter clamps, particularly given that their wireless connections mean there are no audio cables that might get stuck in anything when working out. Overall, for Studio 3, this is a simple bonus, as I think most people would agree that over-ear headphones are preferable.

Next, Pure Adaptive Noise Cancelling Technology is used in Studio 3. This implies that the headphones sample the air around you continuously and increase or decrease the cancellation of noise depending on what it detects. While we’ve seen this idea before, it’s finally integrated into it by pretty amazing Beats.

So, let’s say at your cubicle you listen to music, then walk into the lunchroom where a bunch of people is talking and being noisy, the headphones will change the noise cancellation automatically for the best listening experience. With the Solo3s, this is a pretty cool feature not available.

The Studio3 are much better at noise isolation than the Solo3, and by a large margin, which isn’t shocking because they are equipped with ANC technology. They are much more appropriate in the workplace and during commutes for blocking out ambient noise.

Their sound leakage is also smaller, which is extremely useful when used in the workplace, where certain individuals do not want to be exposed to the noisy sound bleeding from the audio equipment. Although serious audiophiles are not impressive, both Studio3 and Solo3 are surprisingly good-sounding wireless headphones.

Both headphones are appropriate for various genres of music, but overall, the Solo3 sounds more balanced and more consistent. Both are not recommended for formal or studio use, but they should be good enough for most people for casual listening.

When it comes to audio quality, the Studio 3 headphones even win out. Both offer a reasonably decent sound, but if we had to pick one at the end of the day, it would be the Studio3s.

They have strong bass, they are good with mids and highs, and they can get incredibly loud. Finally, we found a better microphone and clearer sound for phone calls in Studio3.

The bottom line, the better headphones are the Studio3s. It helps to eliminate a lot of the buzz and hum of the ventilation systems, chatter, and car engines.

However, it does also mean the battery life takes a hit. While the materials are still the same, there is a bump-up in audio quality, the same flawless W1 chip pairing with Apple devices, and some stellar color choices available, and they are not fantastic.

Select Studio3 for an additional $50.Your ears will thank you for it, both in the enjoyment of music and in the fact that after an hour of wear, they won’t be sore.

They are more relaxed, have slightly better-quality audio, and provide excellent cancellation of noise. Both the Studio3 and the Solo3 are not the best options for phone calls, especially for significant business calls.

Although in a quiet environment, their integrated mics are sufficient enough for phone calls, they do poorly in a noisy venue. Instead, suggest a boom mic fitted headset if you are looking for headphones with a better mic, whether for gaming or office use.

While both headphones do not endorse NFC technology and multi-device pairing, when combined with Apple devices, they boast excellent wireless ranges, allowing you more flexibility to walk around the house or in the workplace.

They pair easily with Apple devices, too. You can use their audio cables when their batteries are low, to switch to wired mode, which is handy.

There are long-lasting batteries on both headphones, making them ideal for long listening sessions and all-day use. The Solo3 will last up to an astounding 40 hours per charge, enabling them to last on just a single charge for several days.

Up to 40 hours per charge can also be run by Studio3, but only when the ANC is disabled. Their battery lasts up to 22 hours with the ANC feature activated, which is still fine.

Also, both headphones have fast-charge characteristics, offering three hours of playback for the Solo3 after five minutes of charging and 10 minutes for the Studio3.

The Solo3s also have better battery life, both of which provide incredible playback time. Both headphones also have a quick charge function, which is nice, but the Solo3s also win here once again.

You’ll get 3 hours of playback time with only 5 minutes of charging, while it takes 10 minutes to get 3 hours of playback with the Studio3. This is a minor differentiation, but it’s still worth noting.

It is important to remember first that the difference in battery life between these two pairs of headphones occurs in the active noise cancellation of the Studio3. That needs a lot more power than Bluetooth alone.

There are also slightly larger drivers in Studio3, which need a bit more power. Whether you prefer an on-ear or over-ear design and whether or not you want/need active noise cancellation, the other things you may want to discuss are (ANC).

The over-ear Studio3 would be the best choice for comfort and extended wear times. If you regularly wear your headphones when you’re driving, you’ll want to take ANC seriously. The Solo3 headphones give crazy battery life, bottom line.

Finally, for the gym, the Solo3s is a little bit lighter and therefore stronger. So, if you’re trying to get over-ear or on-ear wireless headphones to wear to the gym, go for a jog, the Solo3s is the way to go, in addition to regular casual listening. Overall, in a few main categories, the Solo3s won.

The Solo3s could be right for you if battery life is of prime concern and you want to get headphones to serve dual purposes (i.e. travel, exercise, casual listening). Plus, there are a lot fewer of them in your pocket.

The Studio3 and the Solo3 both feature on-cup controls for comfort, like any other wireless headphones. Concerning controls, they are about the same.

All provide user-friendly, readily available call and music management and volume change functions. Their on-cup controls are discreet and blend with their corresponding ear cup designs seamlessly. The only notable difference between the two is that their ANC work is additionally regulated by Studio3.

With its closed-back configuration, the Solo3 only offers passive noise isolation. By can the music volume, you can use them for masking ambient noise, but in certain cases, their sound leakage can be a concern.

If you want on-ear headphones with good noise isolation quality, like the newer and more costly Beats Solo Pro, there are far better options on the market.

The Studio3 are, overall, the better headphones. With their ANC function and better noise isolation efficiency, they are more flexible, making them more suitable than the Solo3 for commuting, work, and office use.

Although their battery life is shorter when ANC is allowed, through long commutes and flights and extended office hours, they are more than able to last.

For extended listening sessions, most individuals will also find their over-ear fit more comfortable as it places less pressure on the ears.

Pros and Cons of the Beats Studio3Wireless

Pros and Cons of the Beats Solo 3

Final Verdict on the Beats Studio3Wireless vs Beats Solo 3

If you prefer on-ear headphones because of their more lightweight and more breathable nature, the Solo3 is recommended.

They are comparatively more affordable and slightly more compact, taking up less room when folded in your pocket, which may be favored by frequent travellers. But with their lower noise isolation, they are not as good for all-around use as Studio3, making them less suitable in a noisy environment.

Their close on-ear fit, while being more breathable than an over-ear fit, is often less convenient for long listening sessions. Check out the more expensive Solo Pro instead if you want on-ear headphones with ANC for improved noise isolation.

Last update on 2023-01-23 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API